0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àϼ± °£È£°ü¸®ÀÚÀÇ ÅëÁ¦¹üÀ§¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Span of Control in Front-Line Nurse Managers

°£È£ÇàÁ¤ÇÐȸÁö 2017³â 23±Ç 4È£ p.373 ~ 384
KMID : 0614820170230040373
ÃÖ¾Ö¸® ( Choi Ae-Lee ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀϹݴëÇпø

±è¹Ì¿µ ( Kim Mi-Young ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
ÃÖ¼öÁø ( Choi Su-Jin ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀϹݴëÇпø
±¸Á¾¸ð ( Koo Chong-Mo ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀϹݴëÇпø

Abstract

Purpose: Span of Control defines the scope of the managers' responsibilities to manage nursing staff. This study was done to measure span of control of front-line nurse managers (FLNMs) in Korea hospitals resulting in improvement in their work efficiency.

Methods: A sample of 203 FLNMs from five tertiary hospitals was recruited and completed the questionnaires. Data were analyzed using ¥ö2-test, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe, and Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: FLNMs had ¡®narrow¡¯ (n=8, 4.3%), ¡®appropriate¡¯ (n=161, 87.0%), and ¡®wide¡¯ (n=16, 8.6%) span of control. Span of control had significant correlations with the number of nurses (r=.63, p<.001), the number of non-nurses (r=.53, p<.001), units (r=.52, p<.001), staff (r=.83, p<.001), and programs (r=.67, p<.001).

Conclusion: The research findings indicate that attention should be given to unit complexity, program diversity, total staff, and skills. Moreover, administrators of hospital and nursing departments need to provide systematic support in accordance with FLNMs¡¯ wide span of control.
KeyWords
Àη°ü¸®, ¾÷¹«·®, °£È£ °ü¸®ÀÚ
Personnel management, Workload, Nurse managers
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed